March 17, 2026

Review of Web of Science (2004 version) and Scopus

Posted at 15:41 in Product Reviews and Scopus and Web of Science.

:: I've been trying to make time to learn more about Scopus since we acquired it. It is a very powerful database, with substantial content. Will it supplant others we use here? There is a very detailed comparative review of Web of Science (2004 version) and Scopus, in the v6 n3 January 2005 issue, by Louise F Deis, Princeton, and David Goodman, Long Island University. Their quick summary in one sentence: "Quick summary in one sentence: Keep Web of Science and buy Scopus if you can once the publisher gets the data loaded." Two additional entries related to this review include the authors' comments on a review of WoS and Scopus in the 15 Jan 2026 Library Journal, and a letter to the authors in response to their review from two librarians at the R.W. Van Houten Library, New Jersey Institute of Technology.

Trackback Pings

Trackback URL: http://www.podbaydoor.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/1825

Comments

1 comments and 0 trackbacks received. Post a comment.
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.podbaydoor.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/1825

My colleague, Susan Fingerman, wrote a very detailed review of Scopus for Online magazine (it's put out by Information Today). That magazine is indexed full text in a bunch of the general academic databases like Wilson and Ebsco.

Posted by: Christina Pikas at March 20, 2026 08:34 AM

Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use basic HTML tags for style)